Blue Lives Matter

Trichter & LeGrand DWI Lawyers
Menu
24/7 FREE CONSULTATION

BLUE LIVES MATTER

Trichter & LeGrand DWI Lawyers

In the course of recent events, we’ve heard the media-driven mantras ‘Black Lives Matter’ and ‘All Lives Matter.” 

Well, police lives matter, too. 

Thousands of men and women, who have been participating in protests around the country, reveal that there are huge issues of misunderstanding and distrust between police officers and the people they serve.

A reoccurring issue today is the use of force by law enforcement. 

The use of force is not a question of ‘if’ but ‘when’, and when that moment inevitably arrives, the probability for it to be necessary should not be a surprise. 

Police split-second decisions generally have permanent consequences. 

It is impossible to always reach a perfect resolution to manage physical violence and crime. No officer wants to kill, but every officer, just like every military person, must be prepared to take a life in order to save others for self defense. 

We all know this and ought to support and acknowledge it.

It’s disheartening certain media repeatedly parades certain unrepresentative stories suggesting they are the norm instead of the exception. 

Of course, these narratives are to boost ratings but not truth. 

Sadly, they spark foreseeable conflict between police officers and those that they both serve and protect. 

These off balance stories can recklessly ramp up racism where police officers are being attacked and even assassinated when race was never an issue. 

These actions are an ‘affront to civil society,’ and in particular to recently deceased Harris County Deputy Darren Goforth, his family, the Harris County Sheriff’s Office, and all law enforcement.

If police were construed as more harmful than beneficial, then imagine a society without police or, where police officers refuse to render aid in an area that is openly hostile towards it. 

What other 24-hour non-military agency would be accessible to provide immediate protection in a time of crisis? 

What organization would provide immediate relief or aid during a natural disaster or terrorist attack? 

Who would bring a criminal suspect before our judicial system to deter future crime? 

Who else has received the proper training to conduct a proper murder investigation so that justice is preserved? 

Without this accessibility, proper training and dedication police officers provide, it’s unfathomable to know the number of lives that would not be saved or future crimes that would not be deterred.

The overwhelming majority of men and women who have chosen law enforcement have dedicated their lives to the communities they serve and protect. 

We should continue to highlight the every day bravery that police officers show in our communities. 

They have put their all on the line 24/7. 

We as a free people, and in our desire to continue to be a free people, need to support our police. 

Yes, blue lives matter! 

Moreover, ALL LIVES AND TRUTH MATTER!

TELL US ABOUT YOUR CASE

Get A Fast Response

Form Submissions have a fast response time. Request your free consultation to discuss your case with one of our attorneys over the phone. The use of this form does not establish an attorney-client relationship.

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

MENU

Do I have a choice to refuse to perform police field sobriety testing?

police-breathalyzer
Menu
24/7 FREE CONSULTATION

Do I have a choice to refuse to perform police field sobriety testing?

police-breathalyzer

Yes, you can refuse the police field sobriety tests. Police officers have many tools that they use to help them determine whether a person is intoxicated for DWI purposes.

Field Sobriety Tests: Tools of the trade

Many of these tools are the subject of great debate as to whether or not they are accurate and/or reliable indicators of intoxication. 

The favorite roadside tools of the officer are the portable breath test (PBT) device and standardized field sobriety tests (SFSTs). 

There is no “implied consent” statute that requires you to submit to either a PBT or SFSTs, so you may decline the invitation to take them.

Refusing Doesn’t Mean You’re Guilty

Many innocent drivers do refuse to submit to a PBT because the specimen given is not preserved and the devices are generally not accepted in the scientific community as being accurate or reliable. 

Further, many innocent drivers refuse to submit to the SFSTs because they feel they are uncoordinated and are very nervous so any test results will not accurately reflect their sobriety.

TELL US ABOUT YOUR CASE

Get A Fast Response

Form Submissions have a fast response time. Request your free consultation to discuss your case with one of our attorneys over the phone. The use of this form does not establish an attorney-client relationship.

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

MENU

How accurate and reliable are the police dwi tests used to determine alcohol concentration?

Police DWI Tests Portable Breath Test and DWI Blood Test field sobriety test opinion crime
Menu
24/7 FREE CONSULTATION

How accurate and reliable are the police dwi tests used to determine alcohol concentration?

When we talk about police DWI tests, Texas law provides that alcohol concentration testing can be performed by analysis of a DWI suspect’s urine, blood, or breath. 

All three of these testing methods, however, leave much to be desired.

Police DWI Tests

Urine testing is the least accurate and least reliable means of alcohol concentration testing. Indeed, there appears to be no scientific data that this method is accurate and reliable. 

It’s equally true that this is the least preferred of police DWI tests.

Blood testing, unlike that of urine, is thought by most forensic scientists to be the most accurate and reliable means of alcohol concentration determination. 

From a police perspective, however, because it requires more effort to obtain and analyze a blood specimen, this is thought to be the least desirable and least convenient method. 

Blood and urine testing, unlike breath testing, do provide the citizen an opportunity to recheck the analysis if thought to be erroneous.

Breath testing, from a law enforcement perspective, is the most convenient means of alcohol concentration determination. 

In regard to breath testing accuracy and reliability, there continues to be a great debate among scientists. 

Moreover, under current procedures for breath testing in Texas, breath samples are not preserved for subsequent checks of the initial test’s validity. 

Indeed, for purposes of breath testing, if you are an innocent person and your breath test result shows you to be intoxicated, then the chances of showing error in the prosecution’s case against you are literally “gone with the wind.”

Call us 24/7 to fight flawed police DWI tests

If you’ve been arrested because of inaccurate police DWI tests–whether it’s breath, blood or urine, call Gary Trichter, the DWI Specialist by the National College for DUI Defense, at Trichter & LeGrand to start fighting. 

We understand the science behind the police chemical tests and help you mount an aggressive defense.

TELL US ABOUT YOUR CASE

Get A Fast Response

Form Submissions have a fast response time. Request your free consultation to discuss your case with one of our attorneys over the phone. The use of this form does not establish an attorney-client relationship.

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

MENU